“For me, a basic income means simplifying the social security system.”
To fight poverty and boost its own economy, Finland is planning to issue a check for $876 to every citizen, every month. The concept is called basic income, and the Finnish government is getting closer to finalizing its implementation this month.
The Finnish Social Insurance Institution (KELA) is drafting the plan to pay every one of its 5.4 million people $876 per month, tax-free, which would replace social support programs, such as welfare and unemployment benefits. Though a proposal from KELA isn’t expected until November 2016, a pilot stage is currently planned prior to full implementation of the program.
Basic income has been debated by economists for years, but Finland would be the first major nation to actually implement the model on a universal basis. The arrangement was initially popularized in the 1960s by Milton Friedman and would “provide payments from the state that would increase in inverse proportion to income.”
This could be the Finnish government’s answer to rising poverty and unemployment rates during a three-year recession, and it is certainly popular among Finns. In a recent poll by KELA, 69 percent of Finns support a basic income. Voters elected the Centre party this April, which campaigned in support of basic income, but the idea is popular among voters of almost all parties.
Currently in Finland, just as in the U.S., welfare benefits are doled out based on income. Basic income, in contrast, would be equally distributed to everyone regardless of how much money they make or even if they don’t receive any other income.
Critics argue that basic income would remove the incentive to work and lead to even higher unemployment. Supporters point to previous experiments, such as the Canadian city of Dauphin, where basic income was enacted successfully in the 1970s. Residents of Dauphin were part of a program initially designed to evaluate if writing checks to the working poor, just enough to bring them up to a living wage, would eliminate their desire to work. It didn’t. Checks were written to the city’s poorest residents for five years with no strings attached, and for five years, poverty was eradicated.
Finland could be next to wipe out poverty among its people. Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipilä supports the concept, saying, “For me, a basic income means simplifying the social security system.”
If all goes as planned, basic income could mean much more than that. It could mean an end to poverty and unemployment and the beginning of economic freedom and equality.
Source: US Uncut
Related:
- Why The World’s Second Richest Man Wants You To Work Less
- Sweden introduces a SIX-HOUR working day in bid to reduce sick leave, boost efficiency and make staff happier
- Swiss To Pay Basic Income 2,800$ Per Month To Every Adult
- World's 100 Richest earned enough in 2012 to End Global Poverty 4 Times over
- The Money Masters (Documentary): How Banks Create Money Out Of Thin Air
- The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind (Debt Ceiling Truth)
- Wealth Inequality - The Actual Distributions of Money
- President Of Uruguay, Donates 90% Of Salary To Charity
- The Man Who Lives Without Money
- A man in debt demolishes his house and drops it in front of the bank
- This Guy Just Explained Capitalism Absolutely Perfectly
- Two Cows Explain The World Economy Better Than Any Professor
- The Truth Behind Capitalism
- Stephen Hawking Says We Should Really Be Scared Of Capitalism, Not Robots
- Pope Calls on World Youth to Rise Up Against Global Capitalism
- These 10 Corporations Control Almost Everything You Buy
- The Corporation (2003) Award-winning Documentary
- DEBTOCRACY International Version (Documentary)
- CATASTROIKA Privatization goes public (Documentary)
Excellent idea, especially as robotics are set to increase in the workplace making full-emplyment a notion of the past. This policy will facilitate the possibility of people trying out new ideas, creating a culture of innovation.
ReplyDeleteThe article needs to explain if taxes on those with full-time emplyment would increase to take into account this basic income.
I don't believe this is true. Finland has committed only to building out the pilot, and depending on the pilot's outcome will evaluate whether to move forward. Please provide a primary source for the claim that they've decided to move forward regardless of the pilot's success.
ReplyDelete